Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows 1 'I know the movies can not Be the books. All that I ask is That you be true to the characters. '*
JK Rowling, going to screenwriter Steve Kloves
I read the book about four times. In all, the sixth I think literally the best achieved. But this is just a result of individual, who like architecture and other arts, is conditioned to the public, and further, to the critics.
So for me, the sixth book is the one I liked in ink and his adaptation was more than we should.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is not just a personal view of assessment, and issues much discussed by philosophers postmodern, "we have a cultural tendency rooted in the search for conclusions. And here's the beginning of the end: The seventh book solves everything, sums it up. It is a display of characters and conflicts that all the fans appreciate and eagerly waited to read. At
literature, JK Rowling
will escalate the strata in which the characters are immersed and lead to your child ceases to be literature and become more universal. The children have grown up with it. We have grown.
Fortunately for all die-hard readers of this work, for this adaptation, the writer decided that a single film would not do justice to history. A Warner certainly not disliked the idea of \u200b\u200bextending their gold mine for another year and the result has been profitable for both sides: With the release of the seventh film, Harry Potter has become one of the highest-revenue franchise box office (competing with Star Wars) and has satisfied most fans.
will have to see the conclusion of the story and see-or not-that is level of magic that led to his writing. For now, seeing the film number seven can enjoy not only the most intense scenes between its three main characters, Harry, Ron and Hermione, but a roadtrip
which takes us to enjoy some of the most beautiful parts of Britain and live several action sequences that sucite outside Hogwarts and cover different parts of London and other locations well achieved (the home or the Weasley house Lovegood).
The first, with seven Harrys, achieves a bold start, fun and relaxed atmosphere will not last long on the screen but in our memory. At last we know Bill Weasley (in a forced dialogue) and Fleur returns so feminine and ethereal as we remembered.
Another chapter was expected to occur in the Ministry of Magic, and it is here where the actors
replace the main characters (
anyone said Polyjuice Potion? ) gives the humorous touch to the movie without missing a beat of it. Although not specifically Mafalda Hopkirk looks like is described in the book, thanks to the cast
has obeyed, at least in the physical traits to the characters who occupy Hermione, Harry and Ron in these scenes had certain similarities with them, so that in the fast way to enter in disguise
the government center of magic, do not get lost those characteristics which we recognize in them: the seriousness of timidity disguised Harry, the little eloquence of Ron and fear to face caution Hermione.
animation ever achieved the three Peverell brothers, Don Quixote style drawn by Picasso, is memorable. There is an intention estilísitica well achieved and the audience does feel like a child again while listening to a magical tale.
course this is cut scenes and added some small details that enrich the fabric of visual mode (as always happens in the movies) but the end result is round. It is strange bounce from the Dursleys and momentary mourning the death of
Madey Moody (Mad-Eye) that feels fleeting and little sense. But thanks see Hedwig defending his own and showing loyalty to the end, Harry and Hermione dancing in the midst of desolation and of course, see Dobby becomes a hero as our players feel faint in their fruitless search.
Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint and been working together for ten years and the complicity that Cuarón began to build in the third film (Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban), makes reaching graduating with honors. The three known weaknesses of his characters and that makes them stronger now theatrically Rowling decides to show: Hermione loses control, Harry for the first time, it has a guide that tells you to do and Ron rebels against them. All three have improved their performances but Rupert Grint, who proves once again be the one that has more acting range.
When you see the first movie, in which Voldemort was a disembodied spirit and then go to Fiennes (in the fifth delivery) nearly to death fighting against the abysmal difference Dumbledore understood and there is more to say. The strong interpretation of Ralph Fiennes
becoming more and more sense:
The best British actor of his generation generates the best villain of his time . It's that simple. On this occasion, just see it in a room overlooking his followers with his voice which snake charmer, and then watch over the tomb of Dumbledore to understand that evil is reaching its climax.
Helena Bonham Carter has also been shown to have been a good decision to cast. Neither does the physical features with which Bellatrix is \u200b\u200bdescribed in the story but gives the character that only an actress of her class could achieve: Voldemort's right hand is a deranged woman can kill anyone just to satisfy their master.
I've always liked to be an assembly almost entirely
English. Both sides, the Order of the Phoenix
and
Eaters are increasingly represented naturally. One spectator, not only familiar with their faces, but with gestures and reactions, so that although this time many have minor holdings, as the same
Alan Rickman, always immaculate in their interpretation of Snape
- are best achieved and contribute to a better pace of the tape.
Here the film's balance is achieved through such radical counterparts: Good looking and evil relentlessly rising could not be contained. The eternal struggle. This fight will lead to a second part front and therefore claimed many lives.
For now,
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows 1 managed to do justice to the first part of the outcome, thanks to an ensemble of actors who have found work in a story that becomes complex. But thanks to a director and screenwriter, who after a highly criticized sixth installment but well received, are given the task of returning to be faithful to the novel and at the same time, fans of the film saga.
If you got here, know that as a writer, I feel I must end, but he left many things out: Moon and kidnapped Ollivander, the eccentric Xenophilius Lovegood, Bathilda and Godric's Hollow, the beginning of repentance from Draco Malfoy fears, lifting Neville, Carrow siblings. But hey, this is just a post and not the book. At least have the certainty that if you read the book, as I feel that these lines do not say it all ...
* I know movies are not books. All I ask is that you be true to the characters. Thanks for reading
will have to see the conclusion of the story and see-or not-that is level of magic that led to his writing. For now, seeing the film number seven can enjoy not only the most intense scenes between its three main characters, Harry, Ron and Hermione, but a roadtrip which takes us to enjoy some of the most beautiful parts of Britain and live several action sequences that sucite outside Hogwarts and cover different parts of London and other locations well achieved (the home or the Weasley house Lovegood). 
Another chapter was expected to occur in the Ministry of Magic, and it is here where the actors replace the main characters ( anyone said Polyjuice Potion? ) gives the humorous touch to the movie without missing a beat of it. Although not specifically Mafalda Hopkirk looks like is described in the book, thanks to the cast has obeyed, at least in the physical traits to the characters who occupy Hermione, Harry and Ron in these scenes had certain similarities with them, so that in the fast way to enter in disguise the government center of magic, do not get lost those characteristics which we recognize in them: the seriousness of timidity disguised Harry, the little eloquence of Ron and fear to face caution Hermione. 
course this is cut scenes and added some small details that enrich the fabric of visual mode (as always happens in the movies) but the end result is round. It is strange bounce from the Dursleys and momentary mourning the death of Madey Moody (Mad-Eye) that feels fleeting and little sense. But thanks see Hedwig defending his own and showing loyalty to the end, Harry and Hermione dancing in the midst of desolation and of course, see Dobby becomes a hero as our players feel faint in their fruitless search. 
When you see the first movie, in which Voldemort was a disembodied spirit and then go to Fiennes (in the fifth delivery) nearly to death fighting against the abysmal difference Dumbledore understood and there is more to say. The strong interpretation of Ralph Fiennes becoming more and more sense: The best British actor of his generation generates the best villain of his time . It's that simple. On this occasion, just see it in a room overlooking his followers with his voice which snake charmer, and then watch over the tomb of Dumbledore to understand that evil is reaching its climax. 
Helena Bonham Carter has also been shown to have been a good decision to cast. Neither does the physical features with which Bellatrix is \u200b\u200bdescribed in the story but gives the character that only an actress of her class could achieve: Voldemort's right hand is a deranged woman can kill anyone just to satisfy their master. 
