'I know the movies can not Be the books. All that I ask is That you be true to the characters. '*
JK Rowling, going to screenwriter Steve Kloves
I read the book about four times. In all, the sixth I think literally the best achieved. But this is just a result of individual, who like architecture and other arts, is conditioned to the public, and further, to the critics.
So for me, the sixth book is the one I liked in ink and his adaptation was more than we should.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is not just a personal view of assessment, and issues much discussed by philosophers postmodern, "we have a cultural tendency rooted in the search for conclusions. And here's the beginning of the end: The seventh book solves everything, sums it up. It is a display of characters and conflicts that all the fans appreciate and eagerly waited to read. At
literature, JK Rowling will escalate the strata in which the characters are immersed and lead to your child ceases to be literature and become more universal. The children have grown up with it. We have grown.
Fortunately for all die-hard readers of this work, for this adaptation, the writer decided that a single film would not do justice to history. A Warner certainly not disliked the idea of \u200b\u200bextending their gold mine for another year and the result has been profitable for both sides: With the release of the seventh film, Harry Potter has become one of the highest-revenue franchise box office (competing with Star Wars) and has satisfied most fans.
The first, with seven Harrys, achieves a bold start, fun and relaxed atmosphere will not last long on the screen but in our memory. At last we know Bill Weasley (in a forced dialogue) and Fleur returns so feminine and ethereal as we remembered.
animation ever achieved the three Peverell brothers, Don Quixote style drawn by Picasso, is memorable. There is an intention estilísitica well achieved and the audience does feel like a child again while listening to a magical tale.
Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint and been working together for ten years and the complicity that Cuarón began to build in the third film (Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban), makes reaching graduating with honors. The three known weaknesses of his characters and that makes them stronger now theatrically Rowling decides to show: Hermione loses control, Harry for the first time, it has a guide that tells you to do and Ron rebels against them. All three have improved their performances but Rupert Grint, who proves once again be the one that has more acting range.
When you see the first movie, in which Voldemort was a disembodied spirit and then go to Fiennes (in the fifth delivery) nearly to death fighting against the abysmal difference Dumbledore understood and there is more to say. The strong interpretation of Ralph Fiennes becoming more and more sense: The best British actor of his generation generates the best villain of his time . It's that simple. On this occasion, just see it in a room overlooking his followers with his voice which snake charmer, and then watch over the tomb of Dumbledore to understand that evil is reaching its climax.
Helena Bonham Carter has also been shown to have been a good decision to cast. Neither does the physical features with which Bellatrix is \u200b\u200bdescribed in the story but gives the character that only an actress of her class could achieve: Voldemort's right hand is a deranged woman can kill anyone just to satisfy their master. I've always liked to be an assembly almost entirely English. Both sides, the Order of the Phoenix and Eaters are increasingly represented naturally. One spectator, not only familiar with their faces, but with gestures and reactions, so that although this time many have minor holdings, as the same Alan Rickman, always immaculate in their interpretation of Snape - are best achieved and contribute to a better pace of the tape.
Here the film's balance is achieved through such radical counterparts: Good looking and evil relentlessly rising could not be contained. The eternal struggle. This fight will lead to a second part front and therefore claimed many lives.
For now, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows 1 managed to do justice to the first part of the outcome, thanks to an ensemble of actors who have found work in a story that becomes complex. But thanks to a director and screenwriter, who after a highly criticized sixth installment but well received, are given the task of returning to be faithful to the novel and at the same time, fans of the film saga.
If you got here, know that as a writer, I feel I must end, but he left many things out: Moon and kidnapped Ollivander, the eccentric Xenophilius Lovegood, Bathilda and Godric's Hollow, the beginning of repentance from Draco Malfoy fears, lifting Neville, Carrow siblings. But hey, this is just a post and not the book. At least have the certainty that if you read the book, as I feel that these lines do not say it all ...
* I know movies are not books. All I ask is that you be true to the characters. Thanks for reading
0 comments:
Post a Comment